One Judge with the cahones to DO THE RIGHT THING!

Could this be the end of secrecy in ‘child protection’?

Sir James Munby, an unusually humane and intelligent judge, is bent on rolling back the blanket of secrecy that has concealed many horror stories from public view

Sir James Munby says orders to remove children from their parents ‘are among the most drastic any judge in any jurisdiction is empowered to make’

Sir James Munby says orders to remove children from their parents ‘are among the most drastic any judge in any jurisdiction is empowered to make. By Christopher Booker 6:15PM BST 07 Sep 2013

To the ever-growing number of us who have been trying to expose the corruption of our state “child-protection” system as one of the most shocking scandals in Britain today, there is no question that a judgment published last week by Sir James Munby, now the most senior judge in our family courts, is a very significant legal landmark. For several years I have been explaining here how this system could not have gone so horrifyingly off the rails, with thousands of children being removed from their families for no good reason, if it had not been able to hide its workings from public view behind such a wall of secrecy, going way beyond what our lawmakers in Parliament intended.

In the name of concealing the identity of the children, which all statute law is concerned to protect, not only has this been widened out into a ban on reporting anything that goes on in our family courts (along with a similar ban on aggrieved parents saying anything to anyone about what is happening to them), but it has also been made a punishable offence to reveal the names of judges, local authorities, social workers or anyone involved in a case. I am even not allowed to indicate, however vaguely, in which part of the country a case is taking place. All this is supposedly in the cause just of protecting the identity of a child.

It is the groundswell of anger building up over how this secrecy prevents either parents or journalists from revealing what too often appear to be terrible travesties of justice that Sir James Munby, the recently appointed President of the Family Division, has decided to face head on, by issuing his carefully considered judgment in the case of “Baby J”. The immediate issue was that the father of four children removed by Staffordshire county council had infuriated the social workers by going wild with rage on Facebook, publishing not only the names and pictures of his children, but also those of social workers – along with a volley of abuse at the people he saw as having destroyed his family.

Before ruling on an application from the council for a complete ban on all this, Munby devoted most of his 26-page judgment to the more general question of whether the secrecy imposed on such cases has gone too far. Since the abolition of the death penalty, he says, the kind of orders a judge has to make on whether children should be removed from their parents “are among the most drastic any judge in any jurisdiction is empowered to make”. When a young mother is forced to lose her child, she and the child may have to live with the consequences of that decision for, respectively, 70 or 90 years.

In light of this, says Munby, “public debate and the jealous vigilance of an informed press have an important role to play in exposing past miscarriages of justice and in preventing future miscarriages”. He emphasises that if confidence in the system is to be “maintained or, if eroded, restored”, it is vital that its workings should be as open to public view as possible. The answer to criticism of “secret courts” must be “more speech, less enforced silence”.


Protecting children 03 Sep 2013 Sir James goes on to consider other issues, such as those raised by the increased readiness of anguished parents to tell their stories on the internet, ruling that these should be subject to the same restrictions as are applied to reporting in the press. But when he finally comes to ruling on the council’s application for a complete ban, he strikes out all the items not referring directly to the identity of children or their parents, allowing the naming of Staffordshire, social workers, “expert witnesses” and pretty well everything else.

This is such a startling challenge to prevailing practice that we will have to watch carefully to see how widely Munby’s principles are now followed. Clearly, this unusually humane and intelligent judge is bent on rolling back that blanket of secrecy that has been used to conceal so many countless horror stories from public view. But I recall one recent case in which a mother described her agony when her newborn child was snatched from her arms while she was breastfeeding. She quoted to the court an earlier Munby judgment, in which he trenchantly ruled that such an action was clearly in breach of “the imperative demands of the European Convention on Human Rights”. The only comment from the bench was “other judges can do what they like, but this is my court”. Now Munby is head of the family courts, we shall see whether his fellow judges accord him more respect.

Adoption madness:
The itch to give children that have been removed from their natural parents to gay couples for adoption (rather than, as in several cases I have followed, to responsible and loving grandparents), is getting into ever more of a tangle. Last week we had the story of the 87-year-old vicar who refused to christen a child because both the lesbian adoptive parents insisted on being described in his parish register as the child’s “mother”. A more “modern-minded” priest was found who was quite happy for the child to be recorded as having two “mothers”.

At least this tale did not have such a tragic outcome as one widely reported in South Africa in April, when two lesbians were tried for the murder of their four-year-old adopted son. An employee of the couple testified that the crime had been committed when the women became increasingly angry at the boy’s refusal to call one of them “daddy”. The more dominant of the partners was sentenced to 25 years for beating the child to death, the other to 22 years for being a “passive participant” in his murder.


Clearly, this is a world wide problem. But as the saying goes, “All it takes for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing.” People like Judge Billy Jackson of the Lauderdale County Family Court, Denise H Burch of Burch law group, supervisor sarah hendershot, district attorney chris connolly, commissioner nancy buckner, DHR workers labrisco cook and patricia miller, DHR florence alabama and Family court florence alabama, should all be 100% ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES for participating in this “farce for profit.” It is hoped by my wife, Kathleen Raskin, aka Kathey Raskin, and by me, Robert M Raskin, aka Rob Raskin, that our children and our families become safer as a result of the integrity of people like the honorable James Munby as opposed to the DIS-honorable Judge billy jackson and his cast of lying cowards who steal children for a living under the guise of trying to be helpful to the children and to their families.


So, new legal paperwork received today indicates that NOW, the very same DHR attorney who was IN Billy Jackson’s Kangaroo Court when my wife, Kathleen Raskin, (Kathey Raskin) who had LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP, was DENIED her right to even speak, and who witnessed Judge Jackson’s CLEAR DENIAL of her rights, and saw our niece being given back TO THE ONLY PEOPLE ON THIS EARTH WHO GAVE HER AWAY AND SIGNED OFF PARENTAL RIGHTS SO AS NOT TO HAVE TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT, is now claiming that the Court erred because our niece was 18 years old.

Now he KNOWS that in the event of a disability, the age becomes 19, and there are other legal issues involved, but NOW THAT HE CAN SEE that Billy Jackson, in cahoots with Denise H Burch of Burch Law Group, and others, overstepped any and all prudence, NOW he’s evidently claiming that since our niece was 18, that NOBODY should be legal guardian of our niece.

Evidently the fact that she has been on disability since she was tested many years ago and determined to have an IQ of 60 is NOW of no consequence.

I am assuming that by taking this court action, which will most probably be rubber-stamped in yet another Alabama Kangaroo Court, that our niece will be free to live on her own.

So, instead of placing her in Scope 310 to teach her life skills, which is what we wanted for her, they first put her in harm’s way, by relocating her to where she is now, and now evidently the DHR attorney is now trying to release our niece completely from any oversight at all by anyone.

It’s amazing that DHR has NEVER ONCE CONSIDERED what would have been in the BEST INTEREST OF OUR NIECE.

So, I am putting DHR and the State of Alabama on notice. We are CONTINUING TO MONITOR our niece’s welfare, and as you all continue to take action, and as the result of that action continues to cause our niece harm, EACH OF YOU WILL ANSWER FOR YOUR ACTIONS in BOTH CIVIL COURT AND CRIMINAL COURT as allowed.

And don’t be surprised if, in addition, you all get to star in the movie :-))

Until next time,

I’m Rob!

Robert Raskin, Rob Raskin



A former family court judge in California is speaking out against a system that is “not about justice, but all about dollars.”

Former Family Court Judge Denise Salcedo said she was trained to ignore allegations of sexual abuse and domestic violence, which led her to make a decision to award custody of a 5-year old girl to her father, who continued to sexually abuse her and subsequently, 2 of her friends, until he was finally caught and convicted.

Judges would routinely get together in a judges meeting and accuse the moms who bring up allegations of sexual abuse or domestic violence as either “she was just having a bad day” or “she must be on her period” according to the former family court judge.

This happens all throughout the country. By some estimates, the Family Court Circus is a $25 BILLION a year industry, and realistically, it’s probably incredibly more than that when taking the income generated from prostitution and child pornography.

Though this is happening every day throughout the country, and throughout the world, our beef continues to be against those who conspired to steal our niece and to put her in harm’s way.

We will NEVER forgive or forget the illegal theft of our niece by Judge Billy Jackson of the Florence Alabama Family Court, Lauderdale County Family Court, of Denise Burch, representing Denise Burch Law, who is a Guardian ad litem, meaning she benefits financially by taking the child away from the parent so when she goes to court, she does so with a FINANCIAL INCENTIVE to destroy a family! So if you’re sitting near her in Church, ask her if she feels that she has a rewarding job, and listen to the B.S. that comes out of her mouth.

Other bit actors in the Family Court farce include Labrisca Cook, Nancy Buckner, Sara Hendershot, Patricia Miller and Chris Connelly, just to name a few.

Every one of these people should be serving life sentences for kidnapping and for conspiracy to commit crimes against nature. Every one of these folks know exactly what they are doing, which is to conspire to steal children from their homes for profit, place them in foster care and eventually sell them to the highest bidder even though THEY KNOW that the chances of these kids being abused is 5-9 times MORE LIKELY after being taken away from their homes, depending on which source is cited.

Parents are routinely lied to, paperwork is often misrepped, especially to poor parents or those with limited education, and meetings are often conducted “ex-partee” meaning behind the parent’s back and often without their knowledge. The conspiring thieves, such as Judge Billy Jackson, Denise Burch law, Chris Connelly, Labrisca Cook, Sara Hendershot, Patricia Miller and Nancy Buckner huddle together in the sanctity of the Lauderdale County Family Court (a.k.a. Kangaroo Court) and decide to terminate parental rights and take a child away from their family, never to be seen again.

PET SHOULD NOT BE TREATED THIS WAY, LET ALONE CHILDREN!!!!!! But as ex-Family Court Judge Denise Salcedo said, “it’s not about Justice. It’s all about the money.”

The fact is that the State of Alabama earns more money by taking a child away from their family then by working out a reconciliation plan or by awarding the child to a family member. Judge Billy Jackson, Denise Burch law, Chris Connelly, Labrisca Cook, Sara Hendershot, Patricia Miller and Nancy Buckner know that often times the family is NEVER EVEN ASKED if they want the child, because the MONETARY GOAL is to steal the child and put them in the system.

As the late, great Georgia State Senator Nancy Schaefer, who was allegedly MURDERED trying to bring this topic to light, once said: “Children are taken because states need the inventory.” Think about that for a second. It’s no different that a supermarket stocking their shelves with items for sale, except that the DHR’s, the FAMILY COURTS, the GAL’s, and the JUDGES all play act this farce that they’re looking out for children while actually stealing them from their families for profit because “they need the inventory!”

Senator Schaefer also said that “poor families are targeted because they have limited education and limited means to defend themselves.”

This happens every day in every state in America, and in many countries throughout the world. Stealing our children with no due process is, from a financial perspective, a HUGE BUSINESS that has ABSOLUTELY NO REGARD for the SAFETY OR WELL BEING of the CHILDREN they are sworn to protect.

There are multiple you-tube videos from ex-Judge Denise Salcedo, who we admire for standing up against the system. We wish her well and we hope that one day, people with a conscience will outnumber those without a conscience, such as Judge Billy Jackson, Denise Burch law, Chris Connelly, Labrisca Cook, Sara Hendershot, Patricia Miller and Nancy Buckner, and that changes will be made to protect our children and stop destroying families.

In the meantime, please see other posts on this sight regarding how to file criminal charges against your judge – YEP – IT’S COMING BILLY – and how to file a Civil Suit against your offenders, county, city and state such as the $20 MILLION SUIT filed by the Reale Family and so many others that are pending throughout the country – YEP – THAT’S COMING TOO, Judge Billy Jackson, Denise Burch law, Chris Connelly, Labrisca Cook, Sara Hendershot, Patricia Miller and Nancy Buckner!!

You folks drew first blood by stealing our niece. Then we learned how many times you folks committed these crimes against other children and against other families.

May there be life sentences and financial ruin in each of your futures……….

Until next time………..

I’m Rob!


Lawless America is organizing Nationwide Filing of Criminal Charges against Corrupt Government Officials and Others. How would you like to see your judge, attorney, ex, or other evildoer indicted, arrested, convicted, and imprisoned?

This article provides a lot of information —

After we all file our charges all on the same day in May, we will start working on the next step in the Lawless America Revolution plan: putting these criminals on trial and take action to seek reparations (payment and other action) to right the wrongs we have endured.

Now, we need you to do several things if you want to participate:

1. Email with CRIMINAL CHARGES in all caps as the subject line if you want to consider filing criminal charges. Include your name, address, and phone, as well as fax if you have one, and a link to your Facebook page. We will need your exact mailing address for some of the documentation that will be prepared. Identify the state and county or counties where crimes took place in your case.

2. Go to and click the LIKE button. This is a new Facebook page for us, and it is vital that we have everyone as a “LIKER.” If you don’t have a Facebook page, simply go to and register. Facebook is used in the promotion of this project and in the exposure of the criminals, so you need a page. You do not have to put any of your personal information on your page.

3. Go to and ask me to be a FRIEND. I will accept.

4. Go to and click LIKE. If you can, take a second and comment on the video. You need a account to do this. It’s free, and you don’t have to give any personal information. You should also go to and click on SUBSCRIBE

5. When you are logged in to Facebook, go to this page on — – Click on LIKE, and then click on each of the links in the story, and then click LIKE on each of those pages. We want Congress to see big numbers.

6. When you are logged in to Facebook, go to this page — and click to JOIN. This enables us to easily send you and everyone else an email with updates.

We’re picking up steam and momentum, so let’s all get on board and bring criminal charges against every one of these judges who have abused their position and authority!

Until next time,

I’m Rob!



First, Happy Thanksgiving Season to everyone who has endured such horrible grief at the hands of the criminals in our government agencies who have conspired to be involved in human trafficking for profit at the expense of innocent children and their families.

At this point, we have brought numerous groups together, each with their own followings, and each with the same stories over and over and over.

What’s clear is this:

1. ASFA, law 105-89, created the window for states to receive billions of dollars in federal aid by stealing children and not giving them back to their families.

2. There is a 6-11 time higher incidence of children being abused, molested, raped and murdered once they go into the system.

3. Nobody in the government seems to care, while others are adamant about protecting the system as is due to the huge amount of money involved.

4. There’s so much corruption at this point, with money trails running so deep, that prosecuting every judge, dhr social worker, etc. would be virtually impossible.

5. As victims, our only choice is to get the best Congress that money can buy to do something conscionable about this.

We do have numerous judges, social workers and secondary workers ready to testify before Congress in January 2013 in Washington D.C.

Bill will have the video completed well in advance of our meeting with Congress.

We are working with producers to air the documentary on National Television in advance of the presentation to Congress to get National support.

And we’re doing all this, thousands of us, expending thousands of hours, and in some cases, thousands of dollars, to bring about a positive change in the law so the incentives to steal children are removed. With no financial incentive, there will be no reason to continue to destroy families for profit.

The bigger issue is that if we are successful in changing the law and stopping billions of dollars from being paid to the states, many states, already on the verge of bankruptcy, may be forced over their own financial cliffs due to a loss of the funds from this source.

What I propose is to simply change the requirement for states to receive this form of federal aid from being paid for stealing children, to being paid by achieving a required percentage of children who pass standardized tests in school from years 1-12 for math, science, english and history.

Yes, I did say “English!” The language of a country binds it together, and the last time I looked, we were STILL AMERICANS!

Thomas Jefferson once said: “A government that’s big enough to give you all that you need, is also powerful enough to take all that you have.”

After the Holidays, we will meet with Congress in D.C. and make our presentation in an attempt to change AFSA 105-89 to remove the incentives to continue to steal our children.

I haven’t even addressed the sale of those children, the pedophiles that buy them, the child porn industry including some of the most powerful people in government, or the funds that states receive based on child support arrangements, which is why often times abusive parents are allowed to still see their children. The abusers pay child support, and in some cases the state receives TWICE the amount of the child support from other federal programs.

I had a comment from more than one exasperated parent asking “why is it taking so long.” It’s taking so long because the money trail is so powerful and so corrupting, that just like a drug, people are willing to kill for it, as evidenced by Nancy Schaefer.

Federal and State investigations continue on an individual basis, with the hope to indict numerous people in 2013 and to try them for their crimes.

To all of the victims, I will keep you posted and we will work to change the law. Please check and for two additional sites, or google dhrpetitions, cpspetitions, etc to see how widespread of an issue this is throughout the country.

To all the perpetrators, WE’RE COMING FOR YOU.

Until next time,

I’m Rob Raskin, my lovely wife is Kathey Raskin, and though we didn’t ask for this fight, once we saw all the harm that’s been done to so many children and to so many families, and all of the taxpayer’s money that has been misused, we are now 100% committed, along with so many others that are fighting this fight, to effectuate a positive change in this system in 2012.

Please continue to provide information and to monitor this site for new information.


Violation of Numerous Laws may lead to Investigation, Indictments!

Helpful Laws Courtesy of

On June 10, 2011, the Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion in Ex parte E.R.G. and D.W.G. that quotes the Supreme Court of the United States, that it is clear the U.S. Constitution, “requires that a prior and independent finding of parental unfitness – by clear and convincing evidence – must be made before the court may proceed to the question of whether an order disturbing and limiting a parent’s ‘care, custody, and control’ of his or her child is in that child’s best interests.”

The E.R.G. Court also quotes a long line of law, including U.S. Supreme Court Justice Scalia’s dissent in Troxel v. Granville that, “recognizes that the right of parents to make decisions regarding a child’s care, control, education, health, and religion, as well as with whom the child will associate, is a fundamental right that arises “as an inherent consequence of the parent-child relationship independent of any case law, statute, or constitutional provision.”

The Troxel Court said, “The Due Process Clause – of the U.S. Constitution 14th Amendment – does not permit a State (judge) to infringe on the fundamental right of parents to make child rearing decisions simply because a state judge believes a “better” decision could be made.”

Those who violate the sanctity of family must be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Denise Burch now attempts to trample our 1st Amendment Rights to Free Speech!

Here’s an update! After STEALING our niece with NO DUE PROCESS, after placing her back in the ONLY HOME where she was ABUSED in her life, after taking away her Aunt’s guardianship rights after almost 10 years, and after completing ignoring a filed court order for guardianship by Dee’s second Aunt, Denise Burch and judge billy jackson CONSPIRED to deny the second Aunt the RIGHT TO SPEAK in Court on July 20th 2012.

NOW that we’ve made enough of a fuss to be heard, Denise H Burch is planning on filing a motion for us to CEASE AND DESIST so we can’t talk about OUR OWN NIECE BEING STOLEN!!!! Is judge billy jackson suppose to rule on this too?





Denise Burch, Labrisco Cook, Sarah Hendershot, Nancy Buckner, and of course, judge Billy Jackson, let me share something with you:



CAN YOU HEAR US NOW?????????????